Who Framed Roger Rabbit Easter Egg - Jessica's Rabbit

During the scene when Jessica and Eddie are getting away in the taxi and crash into the lightpole, Jessica and Eddie are thrown from the car. As Jessica is spinning through the air, her skirt moves just enough to show that she's not wearing underwear.

And after seeing the other little trick that was thrown into the movie (Baby Herman), I'm guessing the same animator drew it.

You can see the frames from the movie here:
http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/jessica.htm

Spread the word and if you like this Egg!
User Rating:
6.6
  6.6/10 with 158 votes
Contributed By: Anonymous on 02-29-2000
Reviewed By: Webmaster
Special Requirements: VCR with slow-motion
Please correct this Egg if you see errors.

Pictures and Videos

None posted yet. Send us yours and be the first!

Comments

Jade writes:
If animated ducks don't have to wear pants, then why should animated people have to wear underwear??
53 of 69 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes No
smirk writes:
Hello boys. Apparently you've all been dating women who don't dress in full evening wear. This typically includes a pair of hose. Most nylons come with panties stitched in, and to avoid a panty-line, any self-respecting, slinky, sex-pot nightclub singer will take full advantage of this fact. I'm sure Jessica's no exception. BTW this response comes from checking out the images on the snopes site - note that the area in question is panty-shaped and tinted darker than the surrounding area. I can tell you from experience, that's the effect you'll get from hosiery. Ciao.
36 of 58 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes No
Tsuzyoko writes:
There is also a picture of that frame and the edited DVD frame on Wikipedia.
14 of 23 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes No
MonkeyMan writes:
There's nothing in there that looks dirty to me. I can plainly see nothing but blank space, meaning either panties or absolutely nothing (in which case I feel extremely sorry for Roger).
15 of 28 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes No
fatfews writes:
Of course it's not wearing any underwear. It's a picture.
11 of 22 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes No
In This scene if you pause after the crash as she flying in the air advance frame by frame until she hits the ground the watch as she keeps spinning on the ground you can plainly see she is wearing panties because you can see the edge around her legs
10 of 20 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes No
KillerBob writes:
dux - root word for the english "duke", which is also a literal translation of the original latin. If dukes don't wear pants, then I'm gravely mistaken about the Royal Family's sense of humour.
10 of 21 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes No
Little D writes:
She's not wearing underwear or panty hose. The animators drew her nude underneath and were fired, when word got around about this.
20 of 41 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes No
JimmyGoGO writes:
Sorry no panties are visible, no just a shaded area.
8 of 17 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes No
Jade writes:
Lovely grammar. What exactly is a dux?
5 of 13 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes No
bluewail writes:
no, i agree, you can completely see everything. there's even a line where.... yeah, you know what i mean.
7 of 20 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes No
WeirdOne1977 writes:
I just recently purchased the newly released DVD and it is there. You have to pause it and go slow right after Benny hits the light post. There are two frames where there is no mistake of what you see.
3 of 16 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes No
it's true. i saw it. saw it with me own eyes! anyway its true
3 of 23 people found this comment helpful. Did you? Yes No


Register - Privacy Policy - About Us - Contact Us